Activeness of the Learning Process through the Think Pair Share Learning Model in Basic Electrical Subjects at SMKN 1 Lhoknga

Faisal Azmi -; Fathiah; Muhammad Rizal Fachri

Faisal Azmi - -
Fathiah Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh
Muhammad Rizal Fachri Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh

Keywords: Vocational School, Learning Model, Think Pair Share, Engagement, Basic Electricity.

Abstract

Vocational High School is an education that is organized by preparing students to work in accordance with certain fields. Vocational learning is lacking in the aspect of understanding so that it can affect student learning outcomes. At SMKN 1 Lhoknga, students' understanding is still lacking because the learning model applied is less able to optimize the development of students' understanding. To overcome this problem, the Think Pair Share learning model is applied which is in accordance with the learner-centered curriculum. The study aims to see the response and changes in the activeness of students in basic electrical subjects by applying the Think Pair Share model. This research uses a quantitative approach. The sample in this study were all students of class X TITL SMKN 1 Lhoknga, totaling 27 students. The instruments used are observation sheets and questionnaires. The results showed that the Think Pair Share learning model the average level of student activeness obtained was 79 with a trend of 79 ≥ 73.3 which was included in the very high category of student activeness. As for the response of students, it is 77.04%. Based on the results of this study, it can be concluded that the use of the Think Pair Share model can increase the activeness of students in basic electrical materials.

References

[1] A. N. Syailla, “Pengaruh Praktik Kerja Industri Dan Motivasi Kerja Terhadap Kesiapan Kerja Siswa Kelas XII,” Psikoborneo J. Ilm. Psikol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 358–365, 2017, doi: 10.30872/psikoborneo.v5i3.4421.
[2] F. Khaidir, A. Amran, and I. A. Noor, “Peningkatan Kualitas Pendidikan Dasar Melalui Implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar dalam Mewujudkan Suistanable Developments Goal’s,” Attadib J. Elem. Educ., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1–27, 2023, doi: 10.32507/attadib.v7i2.1944.
[3] S. Ningsih and D. Sunarsih, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share Terhadap Hasil Belajar dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Peserta Didik Kelas III SDN Cimohong 03,” Innov. J. Soc. Sci. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2023.
[4] M. A. B. Ginting, “Model Project Citizen Untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Kewarganegaraan Siswa Sekolah Dasar (Literature Review),” Semin. Nas. Lppm Ummat, vol. 2, no. 0, pp. 310–325, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://journal.ummat.ac.id/index.php/semnaslppm/article/view/14197.
[5] C. Anugrah, Ristiano, R. Fitri, and G. Hijrah Selaras, “Pengaruh Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tps (Think Pair Share) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Sma,” J. Pendidik. dan Kegur., vol. 1, no. 5, pp. 373–383, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://jpk.joln.org/index.php/2/article/view/46.
[6] N. Efendi and M. I. Sholeh, “Manajemen Pendidikan Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran,” Acad. J. Teach. Learn., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 68–85, 2023, doi: 10.59373/academicus.v2i2.25.
[7] F. N. Izzah, Y. A. Khofshoh, Z. Sholihah, Y. Nurningtias, and N. Wakhidah, “Analisis Faktor-faktor Pemicu Turunnya Keaktifan Siswa dalam Proses Pembelajaran Mata Pelajaran IPA di Masa Pandemi,” Pensa E-jurnal Pendidik. Sains, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 150–154, 2022, doi: https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pensa/article/view/43965.
[8] A. Kharis, “Upaya Peningkatan Keaktifan Siswa melalui Model Pembelajaran Picture and Picture Berbasis IT pada Tematik,” Mimb. PGSD Undiksha, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 173–180, 2019, doi: 10.23887/jjpgsd.v7i3.19387.
[9] Z. Hasanah and A. S. Himami, “Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dalam Menumbuhkan Keaktifan Belajar Siswa,” Irsyaduna J. Stud. Kemahasiswaaan, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2021, doi: 10.54437/irsyaduna.v1i1.236.
[10] O. R. Y. Pradana, “Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Think Pair Share (TPS) Pada Prestasi matematika Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama,” J. Jendela Pendidik., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–6, 2021, doi: 10.57008/jjp.v1i1.1.
[11] D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Parama Publishing, 2017.
[12] I. M. D. Yase, B. Basuki, and S. Savitri, “Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Peserta Didik (LKPD) Berbasis Inkuiri Pada Materi Sistem Sirkulasi Di Sma Negeri 5 Palangka Raya,” BiosciED J. Biol. Sci. Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2020, doi: 10.37304/bed.v1i1.2197.