Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill-based Test in Mathematics Learning
Keywords:
higher order thinking skills, mathematics learning, test
Abstract
Human thinking abilities in the world of education are generally categorized into two parts, namely the ability to think critically and the ability to think creatively, both of which are included in high-level thinking abilities. This research aims to develop a Higher Order Thinking Skill-based question instrument in mathematics learning. The method involves development studies using Tessmer's Formative Research Design model. This research involved experts from academics and mathematics practitioners as well as class X Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Pohuwato. Data was obtained from the description test and analyzed to measure the validity, reliability, level of difficulty, and distinguishing power of the instrument. The results showed that of the 60 class further to poor higher level thinking abilities. Even though there are no students with very good high-level thinking abilities, the average high-level thinking ability of all class X students at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Pohuwato is 57.38, indicating that the test instrument is effective. The Higher Order Thinking Skills description test questions that were tested had high validity and reliability, as well as a good level of difficulty and differentiating ability of the questions, making this test instrument suitable for evaluating students' higher order thinking abilities
References
1. Abbas, Nurhayati. (2002). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berorientasi Model Pembelajaran Terbalik (Reciprocal Teaching) di SMU. Gorontalo: IKIP Negeri Gorontalo.
2. Anderson, Lorin dan Krathwohl, David. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assesing ; A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Education Objectives. New York : Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.
3. Anhar, Dasopang, M. D., Lubis, A. H., Pane, A., Nijar, A., & Harahap, I. (2023). How do the Concept Design and Pancasila Study Integrate Islamic Vision and Nationality Towards Indonesian Moslem in Millennium Era. 2nd Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2021), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12889.
4. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
5. Arifin, Zainal. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Cet V. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
6. Aris, Kartikasari dan Djamilah Bondan. (2015) . Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Howard Garner’s Multiple Intelligences Berorientasi Pada Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal , h.1034.
7. Asep, Jihad. dan Abdul, Haris. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Multi Pressindo.
8. Bloom, Benjamin Samuel., (Ed). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goal. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.
9. Dasopang, M. D., Nasution, I. F. A., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). The Role of Religious and Cultural Education as A Resolution of Radicalism Conflict in Sibolga Community. HTS Theological Studies, 79(1), 1–7.
10. Hamid, Abdul. (2019). Penyusunan Tes Tertulis (Paper and Pencil Test). Jawa Timur : Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
11. Hazrullah, & Lubis, A. H. (2023). The Interactive Multimedia Based on Theo-Centric Approach as Learning Media during the Covid-19 Pandemic. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(2), 210–222.
12. Kasturi,dkk. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Problem Posing Berorientasi Penerapan HOTS pada Materi Kesebangunan Kelas IX, Jurnal. h. 18
13. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayan. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta : Tim Desain Grafis
14. Lubis, A. H. (2019). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar melalui Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Numered Heads Together. FORUM PAEDAGOGIK, 11(2), 127–143.
15. Lubis, A. H., & Dasopang, M. D. (2020). Pengembangan Buku Cerita Bergambar Berbasis Augmented Reality untuk Mengakomodasi Generasi Z. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(6), 780–791.
16. Lubis, A. H., & Dasopang, M. D. (2021). Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic: How is It Implemented in Elementary Schools? Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 120–134.
17. Lubis, A. H., & Wangid, M. N. (2019). Augmented Reality-assisted Pictorial Storybook: Media to Enhance Discipline Character of Primary School Students. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.16415
18. Lubis, A. H., Yusup, F., Dasopang, M. D., & Januariyansah, S. (2021). Effectivity of Interactive Multimedia with Theocentric Approach to the Analytical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students in Science Learning. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(2), 215–226.
19. Maulana. (2017). Konsep Dasar Matematika dan Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis-Kreatif. Sumedang: UPI Sumedang Press.
20. Onosko & Newmann. (1994). Creating More Thoughtful Learning Environment. In J. Mangieri, & C. C. Blocks (Eds.), Creating Powerful Thinking in Teachers and Students Diverse Perspectives (pp. 27-49). Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace College PublishersCohen, Louis, et al. 2012. Research Methods in Education. Great Britain: TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall.
21. Ridwan. (2009). Metode dan teknik menyusun tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
22. Safithry, Esty Aryani. (2018). Asesmen Teknik Tes dan Non Tes. Malang : CV IRDH.
23. Silvia, I., Oviana, W., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). Improving Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students by Using Mind Mapping Models with Audio Visual Media: A Classroom Action Research. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 1(2), 41–53.
24. Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Proses Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rodakarya.
25. Sudjiono, Anas. (2003). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
26. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
27. Swarto. (2003). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
28. Tessmer, Martin. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. London: Kogan.
29. Uno, Hamzah & Satria, Koni. (2014). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
30. Utari, Retno. (2011). Taksonomi Bloom, Apa dan Bagaimana Cara Menggunakannya ? Jakarta : Pusdiklat KNPK.
31. Wicha, Dafik, dkk. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Karakter Pada Pembelajaran Quantum Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Garis Lurus SMP Kelas VIII, Kadikma 3 No.3. h.161-164.
2. Anderson, Lorin dan Krathwohl, David. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assesing ; A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy Of Education Objectives. New York : Addison Wesley Lonman Inc.
3. Anhar, Dasopang, M. D., Lubis, A. H., Pane, A., Nijar, A., & Harahap, I. (2023). How do the Concept Design and Pancasila Study Integrate Islamic Vision and Nationality Towards Indonesian Moslem in Millennium Era. 2nd Paris Van Java International Seminar on Health, Economics, Social Science and Humanities (PVJ-ISHESSH 2021), 116–124. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v8i4.12889.
4. Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2012). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara.
5. Arifin, Zainal. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran, Cet V. Bandung : PT Remaja Rosdakarya
6. Aris, Kartikasari dan Djamilah Bondan. (2015) . Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Howard Garner’s Multiple Intelligences Berorientasi Pada Kemampuan Koneksi Matematis Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal , h.1034.
7. Asep, Jihad. dan Abdul, Haris. (2012). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Multi Pressindo.
8. Bloom, Benjamin Samuel., (Ed). (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goal. Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: Longman.
9. Dasopang, M. D., Nasution, I. F. A., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). The Role of Religious and Cultural Education as A Resolution of Radicalism Conflict in Sibolga Community. HTS Theological Studies, 79(1), 1–7.
10. Hamid, Abdul. (2019). Penyusunan Tes Tertulis (Paper and Pencil Test). Jawa Timur : Uwais Inspirasi Indonesia.
11. Hazrullah, & Lubis, A. H. (2023). The Interactive Multimedia Based on Theo-Centric Approach as Learning Media during the Covid-19 Pandemic. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 12(2), 210–222.
12. Kasturi,dkk. (2015). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Problem Posing Berorientasi Penerapan HOTS pada Materi Kesebangunan Kelas IX, Jurnal. h. 18
13. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayan. (2018). Buku Pegangan Pembelajaran Berorientasi pada Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jakarta : Tim Desain Grafis
14. Lubis, A. H. (2019). Upaya Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Dasar melalui Model Cooperative Learning Tipe Numered Heads Together. FORUM PAEDAGOGIK, 11(2), 127–143.
15. Lubis, A. H., & Dasopang, M. D. (2020). Pengembangan Buku Cerita Bergambar Berbasis Augmented Reality untuk Mengakomodasi Generasi Z. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 5(6), 780–791.
16. Lubis, A. H., & Dasopang, M. D. (2021). Online Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic: How is It Implemented in Elementary Schools? Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 120–134.
17. Lubis, A. H., & Wangid, M. N. (2019). Augmented Reality-assisted Pictorial Storybook: Media to Enhance Discipline Character of Primary School Students. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.17509/mimbar-sd.v6i1.16415
18. Lubis, A. H., Yusup, F., Dasopang, M. D., & Januariyansah, S. (2021). Effectivity of Interactive Multimedia with Theocentric Approach to the Analytical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students in Science Learning. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(2), 215–226.
19. Maulana. (2017). Konsep Dasar Matematika dan Pengembangan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis-Kreatif. Sumedang: UPI Sumedang Press.
20. Onosko & Newmann. (1994). Creating More Thoughtful Learning Environment. In J. Mangieri, & C. C. Blocks (Eds.), Creating Powerful Thinking in Teachers and Students Diverse Perspectives (pp. 27-49). Forth Worth: Harcourt Brace College PublishersCohen, Louis, et al. 2012. Research Methods in Education. Great Britain: TJ International Ltd, Padstow, Cornwall.
21. Ridwan. (2009). Metode dan teknik menyusun tesis. Bandung: Alfabeta.
22. Safithry, Esty Aryani. (2018). Asesmen Teknik Tes dan Non Tes. Malang : CV IRDH.
23. Silvia, I., Oviana, W., & Lubis, A. H. (2023). Improving Learning Outcomes of Elementary School Students by Using Mind Mapping Models with Audio Visual Media: A Classroom Action Research. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 1(2), 41–53.
24. Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Proses Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Bandung : PT Remaja Rodakarya.
25. Sudjiono, Anas. (2003). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : PT Raja Grafindo Persada.
26. Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung : Alfabeta.
27. Swarto. (2003). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
28. Tessmer, Martin. (1993). Planning and conducting formative evaluations: Improving the quality of education and training. London: Kogan.
29. Uno, Hamzah & Satria, Koni. (2014). Assessment Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Bumi Aksara
30. Utari, Retno. (2011). Taksonomi Bloom, Apa dan Bagaimana Cara Menggunakannya ? Jakarta : Pusdiklat KNPK.
31. Wicha, Dafik, dkk. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Matematika Berbasis Karakter Pada Pembelajaran Quantum Pokok Bahasan Persamaan Garis Lurus SMP Kelas VIII, Kadikma 3 No.3. h.161-164.
Published
2024-02-29
How to Cite
Abdullah, R. (2024). Development of Higher Order Thinking Skill-based Test in Mathematics Learning. urnal endidikan rofesi uru, 2(1), 1-11. etrieved from https://journal31.ar-raniry.ac.id/ppg/article/view/4331
Section
Articles
